This was, quite simply, the most hateful book that I have ever read. This 550 page diatribe against Western Civilization in general & white, male, able-bodied, Christians in specific, is shockingly intolerant. Moreover, it is filled with a kind of self-loathing that makes one question the author's mental stability. And if all that's not enough, it is crammed with a Soviet view of Congolese history that's barely worthy of Oliver Stone. I hardly know where to start. Let's begin with the story: Nathan Price is a Baptist missionary to the Congo, which is on the verge
of independence. He brings with him his wife & four daughters. As Nathan
struggles to bring villagers to Jesus, Kingsolver presents us with the
maundering maudlin mewlings of his daughters: Rachel, the oldest at 16,
is an
And what were those horrors? "The horror, the horror" is, of course, the dying declaration of Kurtz, in Conrad's Heart of Darkness. In that case, Conrad's narrator has just weathered a trip up the Congo where he confronted headhunters and cannibals, in search of Kurtz, who has determined that the only way to save the Africans is to "exterminate the brutes". And readers of Peter Forbarth's great books The Last Hero & King of the Kongo will recall the trials & tribulations faced by explorers like Morton Stanley in the Congo. So we're prepared for just about anything & wait with baited breath for the horrors to descend on the Prices. Instead, we find out that the worst they faced was the absence of Breck Shampoo, the presence of clumpy Betty Crocker cake mix & some pesky ants. While the women bitch incessantly about these formidable hardships & Mrs. Price, overwhelmed, takes to her bed, Nathan (who significantly enough is the only Price who is not allowed a role in the narration of the novel) has gathered a small congregation. Kingsolver makes great hay out of the fact that the churchgoers are the village's losers--the luckless, those who have had twins (a great evil in their society), etc., whereas the more powerful villagers cling to animism. Gee, you're kidding, Christianity is a appealing to a society's most downtrodden members? Who'da thunk it? Nathan, however, has trouble in communicating effectively with the villagers.
He wants them to come to the river & be baptized, but unbeknownst to
him they're afraid of crocodiles. He tries using Kongolese words but instead
of calling Jesus most beloved, can be understood to be calling him poisonwood.
Of course, no one bothers to point these things out to him, so his proselytizing
struggles
The book's turning point comes when the village shaman murders Ruth May, by planting a green mamba snake in their henhouse (it's actually intended for their native servant), and the village chief demands a vote on whether the village should accept Jesus. Jesus loses the vote. (Serendipitously, Ruth May is murdered on the same day that Patrice Lumumba is assassinated). Upon the death of her daughter, Orleanna decides to desert her husband
and Africa (oh, and two of her other daughters) & return to America.
She tells us, "Anyone can see I should have, long before..." & "To
resist occupation, whether you're a nation or merely a woman, you must
understand the language of your enemy. Conquest and liberation and democracy
and divorce are words that mean
But, lest we harbor any fear of oppressive men like the Reverend Price, she informs us, "his kind always lose in the end. I know this, and now I know why. Whether it's wife or nation they occupy, their mistake is the same; they stand still...". Having had the effrontery to equate her unhappy marriage with the genuine suffering that the Congo underwent during a century of harsh colonialism, she assures us that it was okay for her to cut and run. Meanwhile, in the book's only truly sublime moment, the Reverend Price reacts to his daughter's death by baptizing the children of the village without making them go to the river. Realizing that Ruth May had not yet been baptized, he compromises his own beliefs to save the souls of these children. Of course, the meaning of his ineffably tender action eludes the author. The second half of the book chronicles the subsequent thirty years of
the daughters lives. Rachel, a doppelganger for Kurtz' fiancee in Heart
of Darkness, heads to South Africa & stews in her self-righteous
imperialist juices. Leah stays & marries a native & Adah returns
to America & becomes a doctor. Mrs.. Price becomes a recluse in Georgia
& they subsequently learn that the Reverend was immolated by villagers
who feared him.
As to the hysterical portrait of the Congolese struggle for independence: Yes, the Congo was an important flashpoint during the Cold War because of it's deposits of minerals & industrial diamonds. Both the US and the Soviet Union had an interest in maintaining access to these resources. Obviously, these interests were potentially threatened by Congolese independence. Belgium was undeniably an oppressive taskmaster during most of her stewardship over the Congo. But by the time of independence that had changed. First of all, Belgium had decided to grant independence, but wanted to move slowly because, and this was clearly Belgium's own fault, there were so few natives with professional training. But, contrary to Kingsolver's assertion, Congo had one of the highest literacy rates in Africa, over 40%. In addition, industrial production was growing rapidly and the country has vast natural resources. The underlying conditions seemed to be favorable for a gradual transition to a successful independent nation. Instead, the Congolese demanded immediate independence and Belgium acquiesced. Patrice Lumumba, who even those sympathetic to his cause concede was unbalanced, became the fledgling nation's first Prime Minister on June 30, 1960, and within five days native troops mutinied and began raping and slaughtering whites and natives alike. Belgium sent her own troops back in to try to restore order and Katanga province, under the Christian and pro-Western leader Moise Tshombe, declared its independence from the Congo. Lumumba immediately aligned himself with the Soviet Union. The UN, under the notoriously anti-Western Dag Hammarskjold, intervened
and sent in troops to prop up Lumumba & quell the uprising in Katanga.
This intervention was the bloodiest episode in UN history as UN planes
actually ran bombing missions in Katanga. The UN troops used in this exercise
specifically excluded Western Bloc nations like America. Hammarskjold viewed
the UN as a sort of
In the months that followed, President Joseph Kasavubu demanded that Lumumba step down but he refused. Troops under Joseph Mobutu staged a coup and shipped a badly beaten Lumumba to Katanga where he was murdered. (There is some evidence that the CIA wanted Lumumba assassinated, but internal Congolese politics beat them to the punch.) Tshombe eventually abandoned Katanga's drive for secession and became Prime Minister of the entire Congo before Mobutu drove him into exile. Kingsolver takes this set of facts and turns it into some sort of grand Eisenhower-led attempt to impose the American will on peaceloving Lumumba and the people of the Congo. She seems to have synthesized the paranoiac musing of the Church Committee, Tass, Pravda and the Black Power movement into a rich fallacious stew. Her misrepresentations are myriad: Kingsolver: Lumumba threw out the Belgians Fact: The Belgians made a horrible miscalculation & left willingly. Kingsolver: Intervention was for the purpose of securing the natural resources Fact: Pro-western Katanga province had the resources.
Why would we support the UN effort to
Kingsolver: Intervention was Ike lead & US run Fact: UN lead & UN run Kingsolver: UN forces were US troops & left over Bay of Pigs mercenaries Fact: No US forces Kingsolver: Ike, Ike, Ike. She repeatedly uses his
name, as if all of the subsequent violence in the
Fact: JFK became president in January 1961. Doesn't
he share any blame? Moreover, this was 40
Kingsolver: Western nations leant money, knowing
the Congo would screw things up & then the
Fact: the US sent $500 million into a rat hole & never saw it again Kingsolver: The internecine fighting in Congo was purely a result of US/Soviet power politics Fact: It's no coincidence that major players like
Lumumba & Tshombe came from different tribes
Kingsolver: Christian missionaries like the Reverend Price had no effect on the natives. Fact: The population is 70% Christian. Kingsolver: The Congo was an idyllic place prior
to colonization & would be better off if we'd
Fact: Maybe. Let's leave them to their genocide
& starvation & female genital mutilation & tribal
On to the hate and self-loathing: Kingsolver's hatred of Christians is most clearly shown, if not in the title of the book, then by the paltriness of the sins she lays at the feet of the Reverend Price. Her assumption that we will join her in hating him simply because he made his family's life a little uncomfortable, shows that she's blinded by her own pathology. Contrast her attitude towards Price with her attitude towards medical aid workers or Brother Fowles, who abandoned Christianity and went native; she applauds their courage, why not Price's? Or take Leah's statement that she learned from her husband that "One way of surviving heartache is to stay busy. Making something right in at least one tiny corner of the vast house of wrongs." She didn't learn that from her husband. It is the lesson that her father's life teaches all of us; if we will open our eyes to it. There's a great vogue in reimagining literary works from the perspective of secondary characters--the movie Friday is his version of Robinson Crusoe, Peter Carey's book Jack Maggs is Magwitch's version of Great Expectations, etc... I hope someone will someday tell us the Reverend Price's version of this story. Kingsolver's willingness to accept and propagate all of the lies above is obviously symptomatic of a kind of America-hating self-loathing (What else should we expect from someone who had Mumia Abu-Jamal, a malevolent copkilling terrorist, proof read her book). But the depth of this self hatred becomes obvious in the narration of the twins. When a doctor confronts Adah with the fact that her hemiplegia is hypochondriacal,
she resents losing her deformity. "We are our injuries", she says. Adah,
and Kingsolver, assume that her crippled view of the world had provided
her with special insights that have some unique value. What can we say
Meanwhile, Leah actually voices the following thought, "I want to...scrub the hundred years' war off this white skin till there's nothing left...my white skin craves to be touched and held by the one man on earth I know has forgiven me for it." This is not the sentiment of a well person. I pity Ms Kingsolver. What a horrible thing it is to be white & healthy. We can only thank the Earth Mother that she was not saddled with the additional burden that I and millions like me must face up to everyday. Imagine how much greater is the load I must carry, for I am also a male and a Baptist. Assuredly she would whither under such a weight. I am enjoying reading these book club selections because they are acquainting me with the state of women's literature. But I have to admit that I'm amazed at how little progress has been made. It seems to me that books like this are representative of a kind of arrested development. It's time to get past blaming Western man for all of the worlds ills. Enough gynecentrism & vagipolitical tripe! Get on with the business of producing a fiction that is true and universal and instructive. Get over it. Get over us. Amy Reilly response to Orrin's Poisonwood review: A few major points I'd take issue with: when Orleanna talks about "the horror" she is not talking lack of Betty Crocker and Breck shampoo. She is talking about the death of her youngest daughter and the disintegration of her family. By the time her ordeal is over with, I think Orleanna has become a lot less superficial than she was when she started. Her suffering over the loss of Ruth Mae was real. That's pretty much the worst thing I can imagine ever happening to a mother -- having a child die, and blaming yourself -- legitimately in some respects. Kingsolver's politics bothered you a lot more than they did me -- but I will agree with you that it was VERY annoying that she even had them in there to begin with. At one point the characters DO start to sound like mouthpieces for Kingsolver. When the reader begins to really notice the author's presence -- rather than the characters -- that's a flaw, in my mind. The politics per se didn't bother me -- to each his own. Plus, I'm not knowledgable enough about the history of the Belgian Congo to take sides one way or another. I guess I had zero sympathy for Nathan -- not because he's a white man,
but because he was a nut job. He had an arrogance that I found annoying:
was he "saving" the natives for their benefit or for his ego? I think the
latter. His religion didn't make sense for them, and he was unable
to adapt it to
Oh one more thing. I kind of liked all the verbal play. Rachel's "miscontstrued
lyrics" (a game we used to play at Colgate); Adah's palindromes; and even
the way Nathan's words often got garbled in translation. I thought it was
almost like a sub-theme running through the book: communication is very
complex, and words are only one small part. Language is a flexible,
chameleon-esque tool, and the tiniest miss can result in chaos and complete
misunderstanding.
Sue Herzog responds:
I'm somewhat torn. I hated it for the first 20 pages or so-- the "white
guilt" theme began on page 1 which her books always smack heavy of-- but
then did get interested mostly in the description of the
I agree that the characters weren't particularly credible and didn't
empathize with any. However, I truly loathed him although admittedly his
character was the most cartoonlike of the bunch so this isn't really fair.
However, I've no interest in a narrative told from his point of view as
I've met people cast in his vein who trod stoically but pathetically down
their path unable to see anything or even think about anything from anyone
else's perspective. I'm also sympathetic to her view that there are huge
As to the politics, I didn't know enough of the story to separate fact from fiction until I got your note and mean to do some more wading around on the web. Nevertheless, I don't think there are any true black & white lines to be drawn in a global morass like this situation -- but a lot of shades of grey. Bottom line, it was an interesting read primarily because of the memories
it evoked. I've no real desire to read any more Kingsolver (I've only every
read Bean Tree). As to Amy's characterization of the human soul and oppression,
the story and characters were too shallow for me to think on that "higher"
plane.
Brooke Judd responds to Orrin's Poisonwood review: I read your reviews for the Westchester book club - first of all, thanks for saying that it was Ruth May who gets offed. Now I'm definitely not going to finish reading it! Second - you are a NUT JOB! How can you possibly be so sympathetic to Nathan Price??? Granted, we didn't hear his side of the story, but you're deluding yourself about his righteousness - he dragged his family to Africa to try to expel the ghosts in his own closet, didn't give a "good goddam" (Editor's prerogative exercised) about his family AND BEAT THEM! Stop being so defensive about being a white male - NOTHING has been out of your reach because of it - and, as your mother says, you're about as much of a Baptist at this point as I am! And who is Amy Reilly - I liked what she had to say! Find me a happy book to read, please. (Reviewed:) Grade: (F) Tweet Websites:See also:General LiteratureWomen Authors Vintage Books List of the Best Reading Group Books Westchester Women's Book Club -WIKIPEDIA: Barbara Kingsolver -AUTHOR SITE: BarbaraKingsolver.net -PROFILE: The Dickens of Appalachia: In an interview, Barbara Kingsolver discusses her little-known first book, the inspiration behind Demon Copperhead, and what J. D. Vance gets wrong about the rural South (Rachel Cooke, October 17, 2024, AirMail) -INTERVIEW: ‘I’ve dealt with anti-hillbilly bigotry all my life’: Barbara Kingsolver on JD Vance, the real Appalachia and why Demon Copperhead was such a hit: As the Pulitzer-winning author’s little-known debut – about the 1983 Arizona miners’ strike – is published in the UK, she discusses the roots of division in the US, her wild childhood, and putting the story straight about where she’s from (Rachel Cooke, 10/07/24, The Observer) Book-related and General Links: -Barbara Kingsolver Official Page (from Harper Collins) -REVIEW: of Poisonwood Bible (Missouri Review) -REVIEW : of The Poisonwood Bible : Missions Improbable : A stickler for accuracy flubs her facts, while a producer of page-turners leaves his readers reflective (Wendy Murray Zoba, Books & Culture) -READERS GUIDE : The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver (Book Browse) CONGO :
|
Copyright 1998-2015 Orrin Judd