Let's start with a couple excerpts to give you the flavor of what Mr. Brokaw's title means: In the spring of 1984, I went to the northwest of
France, to Normandy, to prepare an NBC
... The year of my birth, 1940, was the fulcrum of America
in the twentieth century, when the nation
That's it in a nutshell. Incredibly enough, he means exactly what he says. This unimaginably hyperbolic sack of tripe has as its premise the single most asinine argument ever made by a network anchor, which is no small feat. It is sort of the literary equivalent of Leni Reifenstahl's Triumph of the Will. Let me make it clear that I yield to noone in my admiration for the men who fought in WWII. Anyone who fights honorably in his nation's service is deserving of our respect and our thanks. But here are a few of the questions that are necessarily raised by Mr. Brokaw's treacly hyperbole: *The first generation of Americans settled and subdued
an unknown land. The Revolutionary
*If there really was a horrible darkness falling
on Europe and this generation fought it out of a
*Why did they declare war only on Japan at that point,
waiting until Hitler declared war on us to
*Is there any reason to believe that there has ever
been a generation of Americans who would have
*Is it appropriate to consider this generation the
nation's greatest considering the fact that the
*How difficult a task was it to win WWII? With
Japan failing miserably in its desperate gamble at
*Having freed half of Europe, why did this generation
abandon the Eastern half of the continent to
*Did this generation's responsibilities cease on
V-J Day? Besides the question of the Soviet Union,
*Do the difficulties of the Depression and service
in WWII really justify the massive transfer of
*Do they bear no responsibility for the enormous
deficits that were rung up throughout their
*Who is responsible for the tremendous cultural damage
that their Baby Boom children have done
Now Brokaw does treat many of these subjects--including interviews with Japanese Americans and blacks--but does not even consider others and its obviously impossible to answer or justify most of them. In the end, what we're left with are some interesting oral histories, like the reminiscences of George Bush and Julia Child, that add fairly little to the prior work of folks like Studs Terkel (The Good War : An Oral History of World War Two & Hard Times : An Oral History of the Great Depression), unified by a thesis that is completely risible. (Reviewed:) Grade: (D+) Tweet Websites:-BOOKNOTES: The Greatest Generation (CSPAN) -BIO: TOM BROKAW Anchor and Managing Editor, NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw (NBC) -Bio from atrandom.com | Tom Brokaw (Random House) -EXCERPT: War and remembrance: Three women and how they served (Random House) -ARTICLE: A 'family portrait of the greatest generation' Brokaw shares the stories of a generation of heroes (CNN) -ARTICLE: The Willow Glen Resident 'Greatest Generation' failed at some things (Carl Heintze, MetroActive) -REVIEW : of The Greatest Generation by Tom Brokaw (Florence King, American Spectator) -REVIEW: 'Generation' lost without connections (USA Today) -REVIEW: (BestsellerReviews.com) -REVIEW: (Manic Monkey's Review) -REVIEW: (Tom Walker, Denver Post Books Editor -REVIEW: A Timely Reminder from Our Elders (K. Daniel Glover, Intellectual Capital) -REVIEW: (Bill Bell, Charlotte Observer) -REVIEW: The greatest Degeneration DID THE HEROES OF WORLD WAR II REALLY KNOW WHAT THEY WERE FIGHTING FOR? (Sarah Vowell, Salon) GENERAL :
|
Copyright 1998-2015 Orrin Judd