Home | Reviews | Blog | Daily | Glossary | Orrin's Stuff | Email

Midnight's Children ()

Booker Prize Winners (1981)

I feel about Salman Rushdie's first big book roughly the same way I feel about Indian food.  The food features a fascinating melange of spices, smells and textures, but I have no desire to consume it.  Nor do I particularly comprehend the attraction of the cuisine of a dirt poor Third World country with more dietary taboos than you can shake a sitar at and, while heavy spicing is a perfectly logical substitute for substance, at the end of the meal one longs to ask: "Where's the beef?".  Similarly,  in his novel, Rushdie combines his signature Magical Realist style and the actual historical background of India since Independence with the family history of the Sinai's to create a bewildering mess of a novel that is heavy on Bombay slang.  The language is pungent but indecipherable and the story is ambitious but confusing.  The linguistic pyrotechnics and luxuriant prose have displaced the meat of the story.

I actually believe that India offers  a unique opportunity to the author of today.  With the end of the Cold War and peace in the Middle East, South Africa and Northern Ireland, many of the settings that offered built in tension have disappeared.  India, however, remains a corrupt political state, is rife with ethnic tension and is nearly at war with both Pakistan and China.  There are so many latent plot lines that it would seem an irresistible setting and I very much enjoyed books like Rohinton Mistry's   Such a Long Journey and Vikram Seth's A Suitable Boy (1993).  But, both are much more traditional, Western-style novels.  As is usually the case, the injection of magical realism into Rushdie's story ends up detracting from his tale rather than enhancing it.  The effort to create an Indian, or postcolonial, style did not work for me; a straightforward narrative, stripped of hocus pocus gimmickry, would have been much more enjoyable.


Grade: (C-)


Salman Rushdie Links:

    -ESSAY: The End-Of-History Smart Set: From '60s radicals to pro-war liberals, the West's last literary clique now seems a relic of the 20th century. That isn't such a bad thing. (Matt Purple, 5/28/21, American Conservative)

Book-related and General Links:
    -REVIEW: A Novel of India's Coming of Ages (Clark Blaise, NY Times Book Review)
    -REVIEW: Sep 24, 1981 Robert Towers: On the Indian World-Mountain (NY Review of Books)
    -Salman Rushdie Links
    -Salman Rushdie: An Overview


A bag of fertilizer has contents, they just aren't meaningful.

- oj

- Sep-17-2008, 15:37


Yeah, because if there's any phrase that can be used to describe MC, it's "where's the beef?" You're right--if there's any thing MC can be described as having a lack of, it's CONTENT.

Thanks for providing some of the most consistent unintentional laughter on the Internet.

- Homer Jay Simpson

- Aug-31-2008, 18:40


Orrin, I couldn't agree with you more; this novel was a completely turgid digression of the post Raj period.

- Jim Ingram

- Jun-25-2005, 14:09


What an illiterate red-neck review! Guys like you desrve George W. Bush!!!

- mRd

- Feb-13-2005, 12:33


Oh my god!that is the most offensive review i've ever come across. Firstly you completly reject a whole style of cooking in the first few sentances, and also i'd like to point out that the majority of Indian dishes do not contain beef, as the cow is a sacred animal to Hindus! I'm doing my final year university dissertation on 'Midnight's Children', and cannot understand how you feel the way you do about the text. Yes it takes a little getting used to the style of Rushdie's novels, but the element of magic realism adds spectacurely to the overall book. i love the book and enjoyed reading it immensely and would recommend anyone to read it to learn not only about the political, economic and social events of the time, but what it felt like to become a free, independent nation after years of colonial rule. It could be useful to many Iraqis in the future!

- Sabrina

- Nov-12-2004, 11:32


I could not disagree with you more about Midnight's Children. I just finished it and it easily ranks as my all-time favorite book -- and I am a pretty voracious reader. I haven't read anything else by Rushdie yet, so I can't comment on how this compares to his other work. You suggested that Rushdie's use of allegory and other literary techniques felt piled on and detracted from the story telling. This is something that I also tend to dislike about a lot of authors -- but not in this case. With Midnight's Children, I was most impressed by Rushdie's ability to use allegory, symbolism, and poetic prose extremely effectively and always with clear purpose. Because he carried it out so skillfully, his writing did not seem to beg attention to itself or distract in any way. I'd like to know if you are just turned off by all allegorical novels or mystical realism, or if you could give examples of these writing styles that you do like.

- Mac

- Jan-08-2004, 14:44


You moronic imbeciles are so daft to even comprehend what a great achievement "Midnight's Children"is. You should keep to your Harlequins.

- Duh

- Nov-24-2003, 06:34


wow! you completely missed the point of the novel. I can't believe you call yourself a literary critic. This is probably the worst book review I have ever had the displeasure of reading. You should be shot in the face.

- tom

- May-28-2003, 16:02


what an lame review. i don't think you've even read it all the way through.

if anything is a bit difficult, you don't like it and give up. then, instead of admitting that it was too difficult for you, you dismiss it as worthless per se.

what's the point of publishing a review of a book you haven't read?

- Brit

- May-20-2003, 05:07


Mad cow disease! All you meat eaters miss the subtlety of food, and as what you consume reflects your view on life, what can I say? I do agree with you on Midnight's children being to caught up initself that it doesnt create the impact it should.

- Helen Bing

- Dec-14-2002, 13:08