Perhaps the absolutely fundamental neoconservative
idea was the need to reassert American
nationalism or patriotism or "Americanism" or "American
exceptionalism": the idea that American
society, however flawed, is not only essentially
good but somehow morally superior to other
societies.
[This idea] is especially associated with immigration.
The future neoconservatives mostly came
from relatively recent immigrant stock. It
is arguable, though certainly unproven, that such people
in America feel a stronger need than those
of longer American lineage to display their credentials
as Americans; or rather, that those whose families
came over on the Mayflower feel that there is
nothing incompatible between deep patriotism and
a propensity to shout about what needs to be
changed.
-The World Turned Right
Side Up : A History of the Conservative Ascendancy in America (1996)
(Godfrey Hodgson)
Boy, Godfrey Hodgson really hits the nail on the head there. Norman
Podhoretz's book, My Love Affair With America, is basically a protracted
attempt to suggest that he loves America more than any of his former rivals
on the Left, or current rivals on the Right. Podhoretz famously broke
ranks with the intellectual New York set in the 1970's, having determined
that their anti-Americanism, most ostentatiously displayed during the Vietnam
War, neither jibed with his own life experiences--the meteoric rise of
a poor Jewish child of immigrants to respected writer status--nor was compatible
with the need to maintain a militarily strong and assertive America, to
stand as a final guarantor of an embattled Israel's continued existence.
He has an easy time rewinning his old battle with the radical counterculture
(though he's unable to resist the compulsion to claim credit for having
created that counterculture in the first place). Their anti-Americanism
is a result of their genuine opposition to freedom, which is America's
organizing principle. They do not wish to perfect America, but to
destroy it and remake it in an image of their utopian (or dystopian) fantasies.
Podhoretz gives them yet another well-deserved drubbing.
But then he takes on the modern Right, and here he founders badly :
In the mid-1990s there unexpectedly came an outburst
of anti-Americanism even among some of
the very conservatives I thought had been permanently
immunized against itÖI was already pushing
seventy, and it made me a little tired to think
of going back into combat over a phenomenon that I
had fondly imagined I would never have to deal with
again, and certainly not on the Right
The anti-Americanism he's talking about is the harsh, but loving, cultural
criticism of Bill Bennett and
Robert
Bork, and the tentative
suggestions on the Religious Right that the Supreme Court may have
so far departed from the Constitution in its decisions on social issues,
specifically abortion and Church/State issues, that it is no longer a legitimate
institution. Podhoretz is horrified by these trends and seeks to
read them out of the Conservative movement, but they were there long before
him and will remain long after.
The problem for Podhoretz, and for neoconservatism in general, is the
absence of a core political philosophy. The Left believes that the
central duty of government is to guarantee equality of outcomes among the
citizenry and that government is capable of solving social problems and
effectively running the economy. Classic Conservatism is structured
around a countervailing belief in freedom, which necessitates a very limited
government, but strong social institutions, and, though it requires equality
of opportunity, accepts that the resulting outcomes will be very different.
Neoconservatism is really only interested in supporting Israel and opposing
quotas, it's largely agnostic on the other issues and has no firm view
of the proper role of government generally. On social issues, a natural
distrust of Christian conservatism and the fact that neoconservatism arose
in the urban milieu, combine to create a willingness to countenance big
government, and the need for a massive military requires big government.
On the other hand, if equality is enforced by the state, it will work to
the detriment of groups, like Jews, who are disproportionately successful,
so there's a reluctance to trust government too far. This naked self-interest
is certainly legitimate, but it's hardly a coherent political philosophy.
That Podhoretz is only marginally conservative becomes clear from the
fact that he almost completely ignores the question of the size and role
of government, from his dismissal of objections to the 1964 Civil Rights
Act, from his failure to discuss, except in passing, the free market economic
philosophy of folks like Milton Friedman and F.
A. Hayek, and from his failure to comprehend why abortion is such a
salient issue on the Right. Even more revealing is his thinly disguised
contempt for the conservative intellectuals of the first half of the century,
who either go unmentioned (Albert Jay Nock, for example) or are dismissed
as cranks (like the Agrarians--Allen Tate, Robert Penn Warren, etc.).
He seems to think that conservatism was born in the 1950s, only became
a significant political movement in the post Vietnam era (not coincidentally,
just after he joined it) and consists of little more than nationalism.
Were that true, were conservatism nothing more than a blind patriotism,
of recent vintage, then he would be right to criticize cultural conservatives
for questioning the moral climate of the country and the direction in which
it is heading. But conservatism, even American conservatism, antedates
America. And conservatism has endured precisely because it offers
such a powerful critique of America. In Albert Jay Nock's great book,
Memoirs
of a Superfluous Man, he says the following :
Burke touches [the] matter of patriotism with a searching
phrase. 'For us to love our country,' he
said, 'our country ought to be lovely.' I
have sometimes thought that here may be the rock on
which Western civilization will finally shatter
itself. Economism can build a society which is rich,
prosperous, powerful, even one which has a reasonably
wide diffusion of material well-being. It
can not build one which is lovely, one which has
savour and depth, and which exercises the
irresistible attraction that loveliness wields.
Perhaps by the time economism has run its course the
society it has built may be tired of itself, bored
by its own hideousness, and may despairingly
consent to annihilation, aware that it is too ugly
to be let live any longer.
By economism, Nock means a kind of unfettered materialism or consumerism.
These lines, prophetic anyway, seem even more prescient in light of the
events of September 11th. There is a palpable sense in America's
continuing discussion of the events that the America that died on September
11th deserved to die (though the victims certainly did not), that it was
too self-centered, too trivial, too degenerate. People have now judged
the America of the 1990s, which Podhoretz is here defending against conservative
critics, and, as W.
H. Auden said of an earlier time, they have determined it to be "a
low dishonest decade."
In the final pages of the book Podhoretz offers a dayyenu, a
list of each of the things that would have been sufficient for us to owe
America a debt of gratitude. After a brief, and platitudinous, generic
list, including such things as "domestic tranquillity" (which one is tempted
to point out that China too enjoys), he gets to his real reasons for feeling
patriotic, and they are all about the success he's made of himself : "...America...sent
me to a great university..."; "...America handed me a magazine of my own
to run..."; "...America saw to it that I would live in an apartment in
Manhattan..."; "...America arranged for me to build a country house...".
It's utterly vacuous and truly appalling.
Freedom is vital to everything that America stands for. It makes
possible the kind of rags to riches story that Podhoretz has lived.
But it is not enough. Conservatives demand freedom, but also believe
that our country "ought to be lovely." This loveliness consists mostly
of
an adherence to the eternal values of the Judeo-Christian tradition, of
which, as Nock says, we are unworthy inheritors. And right there
is another key element, humility. Conservatives realize that our
inheritance is too precious to experiment with willy-nilly and so seek
to conserve as much as can possibly be conserved of that tradition.
Paraphrasing Nock (one last time, I promise), who borrowed a phrase from
Lord
Falkland :
What it is not necessary to change, it is necessary
not to change.
It is this very basic premise of conservatism--that it actually seeks
to conserve something--that Podhoretz seemingly can not comprehend.
More's the pity.
(Reviewed:18-Oct-01)
Grade: (C)
Websites:
Norman Podhoretz Links:
GERTRUDE HIMMELFARB:
Proclaiming Our Principles (Gertrude Himmelfarb, February 17, 2003, Washington Post)
-REVIEW: of The Victorians by A.N. Wilson (Gertrude Himmelfarb, Atlantic Monthly)
NEO-CONSERVATIVES:
THE CLOSING OF THE EARLY MODERN MIND: LEO STRAUSS AND EARLY MODERN POLITICAL THOUGHT (Neil G. Robertson)
THE DESPAIR OF THE NEOCONSERVATIVES (Thomas Fleming, December 24, 2002, Chronicles)
-ESSAY: The Neoconservative-Conspiracy Theory: Pure Myth (ROBERT J. LIEBER, May 2, 2003, Chronicle of Higher Education)
The Bush Doctrine: The moral vision that launched the Iraq war has been quietly growing in the President's inner circle. (Tony Carnes, 04/25/2003, Christianity Today)
Book-related and General Links:
-Norman
Podhoretz : Senior Fellow (Hudson Institute)
-Commentary
Magazine
-Partisan
Review
-Featured
Author: Norman Podhoretz : With News and Reviews From the Archives
of The New York Times
-BOOKNOTES
: Author: Norman Podhoretz Title: Ex-Friends: Falling Out With Allen
Ginsberg, Lionel and Diana Trilling, Lillian Hellman, Hannah Arendt and
Norman Mailer Air Date: March 28, 1999 (C-SPAN)
-AUDIO
: Breaking Ranks by Norman Podhoretz (YAF)
-AUDIO
: The Bloody Crossroads by Norman Podhoretz (YAF)
-EXCERPT
: First Chapter of My Love Affair With America : The Cautionary Tale
of a Cheerful Conservative
-EXCERPT
: First Chapter of Ex-Friends Falling Out With Allen Ginsberg, Lionel
and Diana Trilling, Lillian Hellman, Hannah Arendt, and Norman Mailer
-EXCERPT
: How to Lose Influential Friends, from 'Ex-Friends'
-ESSAY
: Syria Yes, Israel No! : Our anti-terror coalition doesn't distinguish
friend from foe (Norman Podhoretz, November 3, 2001, Weekly Standard)
-ESSAY
: Israel Isn't the Issue Islamic fanatics hate America in its own right.
(NORMAN PODHORETZ, September 20, 2001, Wall Street Journal)
-ESSAY
: America the Beautiful (Norman Podhoretz, Winter 2001, City
Journal)
-ESSAY
: Patriotism and Its Enemies (Norman Podhoretz, July 3, 2000, Wall
Street Journal)
-ESSAY
: Was Bach Jewish? : In his strict adherence to the musical laws
of his time, Johann Sebastian Bach was quintessentially Jewish. (Norman
Podhoretz, December 1999, Prospect)
-ESSAY
: Learning from Isaiah. (Norman Podhoretz, 05/01/00, Commentary)
-ESSAY
: Buchanan and Anti-Semitism (Norman Podhoretz, Wall Street Journal
| October 25, 1999)
-ESSAY
: What Happened to Ralph Ellison.(Norman Podhoretz, July 1999,
Commentary)
-ESSAY
: Life of His Party : How Bill Clinton saved the Democrats. (Norman
Podhoretz, September 1999, National Review)
-ESSAY
: HAS ISRAEL LOST ITS NERVE? (Norman Podhoretz, Wall Street Journal-Op-Ed
September 10, 1999)
-ESSAY
: The adventure of Philip Roth.(Commentary Magazine, April 07 2000
by Norman Podhoretz)
-ESSAY
: The "Loyalty Trap": Glenn Loury, once a neoconservative luminary,
reverses course. (Norman Podhoretz, Jan 25, 1999, National Review)
-ESSAY
: Heroism in a Politically Correct Age (Norman Podhoretz, January 1998,
National Review)
-ESSAY
: My war with Allen Ginsberg. (08/01/97, Commentary)
-ESSAY
: Allen Ginsberg's Secret : What he did with Norman Podhoretz at
Columbia. (Paul Berman, June 4, 1997, Slate)
-ESSAY
: Military Intervention in Central America? (Norman Podhoretz,
July 24, 1983, NY Times)
-ESSAY
: The Cold War Again? (Norman Podhoretz, June 11, 1978,
NY Times)
-ESSAY
: Now, Instant Zionism (Norman Podhoretz, February 3, 1974, NY Times)
-ESSAY
: New Names on the Dust Jackets (Norman Podhoretz, June 15, 1958, NY
Times)
-LECTURE
: Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness (Norman Podhoretz, October
12, 2000, The Manhattan Institute for Policy Research : The 2000 Wriston
Lecture)
-DISCUSSION
: ìTwo Faces of Realityî (Robert Jastrow and Norman Podhoretz, George
C. Marshall Institute Roundtable discussion December 12, 2000)
-ARCHIVES
: Norman Podhoretz (NY Review of Books)
-INTERVIEW
: with Norman Podhoretz (Conversations with History: Institute of International
Studies, UC Berkeley)
-ARCHIVES
: Norman Podhoretz (Think Tank, PBS)
-ARTICLE
: Podhoretz on 25 Years at Commentary (Walter Goodman, January 31,
1985, NY Times)
-ARTICLE
: Critic of the Left Ready to Step Aside (DEIRDRE CARMODY, January
19, 1995, NY Times)
-PROFILE
: Norman's Conquest: A Commentary on the Podhoretz Legacy (Mark Gerson,
Fall 1995, Policy Review)
-ESSAY
: Right Is Still Right (The Conformist [Scott McConnell], NY Press)
-ESSAY
: Poison-pen Pals (Joseph Epstein, March 1999, Commentary)
-ESSAY
: NORMAN'S NARCISSISM: PODHORETZ IN LOVE (Justin Raimondo, October
16, 2000, Anti-War)
-ESSAY
: "Response to Norman Podhoretz," (Peter W. Rodman, Commentary,
January 2000)
-DIALOGUE
: When Is It OK To Betray a Friend? (Michael Sandel and Christopher
Buckley, March 11, 1999, Slate)
-ESSAY
: George Orwell and the Big Cannibal Critics. (Jonah Raskin. Monthly
Review, May 1983)
-ESSAY
: THE PUNCH LINES : Feuding Writers Get Nasty (SUSAN SHAPIRO, Voice
Literary Supplement)
-ESSAY
: BUCHANAN VERSUS PODHORETZ: WHO IS THE REAL HATER? (Justin
Raimondo, AntiWar, October 27, 1999)
-ESSAY
: Breaking up with the Beats : Kerouac and company were my first literary
loves -- but I had to get off their road. (David Gates, April 12, 1999,
Salon)
-Norman
Podhoretz (1930- )(American Literature on the Web)
-Neoconservatism
Online
-ARCHIVES
: "norman podhoretz" (Find Articles)
-ARCHIVES
: "norman podhoretz" (Mag Portal)
-REVIEW
: of My Love Affair (Joseph Dorman, NY Times Book Review)
-REVIEW
: of My Love Affair (Seth Lipsky, National Review)
-REVIEW
: of My Love Affair (William F. Buckley, Jr.)
-REVIEW:
of My Love Affair With America by Norman Podhoretz Yankee Doodle Dandy
Celebrating America While Breaking Ranks and Settling Scores (JIM
SLEEPER, LA Times)
-REVIEW
: of My Love Affair (Ronald Radosh, Front Page)
-RESPONSE
: Row Over Radosh (Jim Sleeper, Front Page)
-REVIEW
: of My Love Affair (James R. Whelan, Human Events)
-REVIEW
: of My Love Affair (Thomas Sowell)
-REVIEW
: of My Love Affair (AntiWar)
-REVIEW
: of My Love Affair (Myles Kantor, Lew Rockwell.com)
-REVIEW
: of My Love Affair (BERNARD BASKIN, Canadian Jewish News)
-REVIEW
: of My Love Affair (Balint Vazsonyi, American Outlook)
-REVIEW
: of My Love Affair (David Mutch, CS Monitor)
-REVIEW
: of My Love Affair (Ellen Willis, dissent)
-REVIEW
: of My Love Affair (Rick Richman, Jewish Journal of Los Angeles)
-REVIEW
: of My Love Affair (Arch T. Allen, Metro NC)
-REVIEW
: of 'Doings and Undoings' (1964) (David Daiches, NY TImes)
-REVIEW
: of 'Making It' (1968)(Frederic Raphael, NY Times)
-REVIEW
: of 'Breaking Ranks' (1979)(Joseph Epstein, NY Times Book Review)
-REVIEW
: of 'The Present Danger' (1980)(Anatole Broyard, NY Times)
-REVIEW
: of 'Why We Were in Vietnam' (1982)(James Fallows, NY Times Book Review)
-REVIEW
: of Why We Were in Vietnam (Conservative Perspectives on Vietnam)
-REVIEW
: of The Bloody Crossroads (Cynthia Ozick, NY Times Book Review)
-REVIEW
: of Ex-Friends (Christopher Lehmann-Haupt)
-REVIEW
: of 'Ex-Friends: Falling Out With Allen Ginsberg, Lionel and Diana
Trilling, Lillian Hellman, Hannah Arendt, and Norman Mailer' (1999) (Richard
Brookhiser, NY Times Book Review)
-REVIEW
: of Ex-Friends (William F. Buckley, Jr., Sacramento Bee)
-REVIEW
: of Ex-Friends (Carl Rollyson, New Criterion)
-REVIEW
: of Ex-Friends and Making It, by Norman Podhoretz (Christopher
Hitchens, Harper's)
-REVIEW
: of Ex-Friends (Arnold Beichman, Policy Review)
-REVIEW
: of Ex-Friends (Jeffrey Hart, National Review)
-REVIEW
: of Ex-Friends (Nicholas Lemann, Washington Monthly)
-REVIEW
: of Ex-Friends : Podhoretz: the man who killed his father--twice (Robert
Fulford, Globe and Mail)
-REVIEW
: of Ex-Friends (PETER WORTHINGTON -- Toronto Sun)
-REVIEW
: of Ex-Friends (A.O. Scott, Lingua Franca)
-REVIEW
: of Ex-Friends (Culture Vulture)
-REVIEW
: of Ex-Friends (ROGER BISHOP, Book Page)
-REVIEW
: of Ex-Friends (Mona Charen)
-REVIEW
: of Ex-Friends (Jordan Hoffman, Leisure Suit)
-REVIEW
: of Ex-Friends (WALTER KIRN, New York)
-REVIEW
: of Ex-Friends (JOHN LEONARD, The Nation)
-REVIEW
: of Ex-Friends (Nathan Abrams, Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck
College, University of London .Published by H-Ideas)
-REVIEW
: of Jewish American Literature: A Norton Anthology Edited by Jules Chametzky,
John Felstiner, Hilene Flanzbaum, and Kathryn Hellerstein (Ruth R.
Wisse, New Republic)
-REVIEW
: of Partisans: Marriage, Politics, and Betrayal Among the New York Intellectuals,
by David Laskin (Kanchan Limaye, National Review)
JOHN PODHORETZ :
-ARCHIVES
: John Podhoretz, National Review
-ESSAY
: A RECKONING FOR THE NOISEMAKERS (John Podhoretz, 9/13/01, NY
Post)
-ESSAY
: Jeers to You, Mrs. Robinson : Whoís the weakest link now? (John Podhoretz,
June 9-10, 2001, National Review)
-REVIEW
: of How We Got Here: The 70ís: The Decade That Brought You Modern Life
(For Better or Worse), by David Frum (John Podhoretz, National Review)
-REVIEW
: of A. I. : Brave New Idiocy : A.I. morphs into a clinical depiction of
the Oedipus complex. (John Podhoretz, National Review)
-REVIEW
: of Atlantis : Disneyís New Ride : How Disney lost its magic. (John
Podhoretz, National Review)
-REVIEW
: Ladies Who Punch : Reviewing Tomb Raider (John Podhoretz, National
Review)
-REVIEW
: of The Animal : The Animal Attraction : Bursting the bubble of cultural
correctness (John Podhoretz, National Review)
-PROFILE
: Oedipus & Podhoretz : His father fought Stalinists. But for Post
edit-page chief John Podhoretz, sitcoms are the battleground of freedom.
(HANNA ROSIN, New York)
-ESSAY
: Poor taste pundits : The outbursts against the Kennedy family last
week by Rush Limbaugh and John Podhoretz were a disgrace to the conservative
movement. (Joe Conason, July 27, 1999, Salon)
-ESSAY
: Media Circus: Doing the right-wing shuffle : John Podhoretz and other
right-wing journalists are the playthings of the big-money conservatives
who bankroll newspapers and magazines in order to further their political
agendas (Eric Alterman, Salon)
MIDGE DECTER :
-REVIEW
: of Hooking Up by Tom Wolfe (Commentary Magazine, Midge Decter)
-ARCHIVES
: "midge decter" (Find Articles)